Definition: Howbeit the hair of his head began to grow again after he was shaven.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Judges 16:22 together. It's a really interesting and somewhat mysterious passage! Here’s what it means in simple terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a very unusual situation – a king who had shaved his head. But, after the shaving, his hair started to grow back. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “Judges 16” : This refers to a specific period of history in ancient Israel, during a time of great turmoil and conflict. “Howbeit” : This is a word that means “even though” or “despite.” It’s used here to introduce a contrast. “The hair of his head began to grow again” : This literally means the hairs on his head started to grow back, just like they did before he shaved them. So, what does it mean practically? This is a very symbolic story. It suggests that: He was vulnerable: The fact that his hair grew back after being shaved meant he was exposed and potentially vulnerable. It showed a weakness. He needed to be protected: The verse implies that this vulnerability needed to be addressed, perhaps through a change or solution. Possible Interpretations & Context (this is where it gets interesting): The story of Samson and Delilah is the most common explanation for this verse. Samson was a powerful judge who shaved his head as a sign of humility and submission to God. However, Delilah, a sorceress, tricked him into revealing his secret strength. This act of trickery caused his hair to grow back. In essence, the verse is about: A moment of weakness or vulnerability. The need for protection and restoration. Important Note: This is an ancient text, and its exact meaning has been debated over the years. It's a powerful image that encourages us to be mindful of our vulnerabilities and to seek ways to protect ourselves. --- Do you have any specific questions about this verse that I can help you with? For example, would you like me to: Explain the Samson/Delilah story in more detail? Discuss different interpretations of the verse?